Medea Greek Mythology Essay Example for Free

Medea Greek Mythology Essay Assume control over rebuffing the individuals who have fouled up to her, she is blamed for needing not justiceâ€vengeance. Since I am not a local of neither Corinth nor Colchis, I have my own view about her thought processes. Be that as it may, I would concur with the Corinthian Women, Medea is looking for retaliation; not equity. A few people may contend that Medea is looking for equity. When in fact, Medea needs retribution. The resistance would state equity occurred in light of the fact that the Gods permitted Medea an opportunity to play out her different demonstrations. In spite of the fact that these things happened Medea went to retaliation when she willingly volunteered to murder Creon and his little girl Creusa. Indeed, even the melody, the â€Å"ideal spectators†, suggests that Creon is a poor lord when, after he exiles Medea, the First Corinthian Woman identifies, â€Å"I am of Corinth and I state that Corinth isn't all around dominated. †(1. 214-216). This statement gives us evidence that Medea has a type of motivation to look for retribution on Creon. Anyway she lets her contempt surpass its limits and permits herself to end the lives of the King of Corinth and its Princess all since they picked Jason over her. Furthermore, her activities all demonstrate that she needs Jason to accomplish more than pay for harming her. She needs him to endure at the destiny of her own kids. Her vengeance was narrow minded. Medea included the two things she knew would hurt Jason the mostâ€her own youngsters. As indicated by the First Corinthian Woman, â€Å"It would be better for you, Medea if the earth opened her jaws and brought you down into obscurity. However, one thing you won't do, for you can't, you won't hurt your own kids, however rage like plague-bubbles throbs, your psyche in a fire-fog nibbles the purple apples of agony. No blood-lapping brute of the field, she-bear nor lioness, nor the lean wolf-bitch, harms her own delicate whelps; nor the yellow-looked at, seythe-curved, and storm carried bird that tears the sheep has ever constructed prey of the product of her own tree. †(2. 115-126). Remember that the Corinthian Women are the aware of Corinth. Through this statement the First Corinthian Women has expressed that Medea couldn't hurt her own kids. She even gives instances of the most hazardous predators that don’t even damage their own young. This is proof that Medea went past the condition of equity; yet she went far into the condition of retaliation. Medea realized what she was doing and in all honesty she could think less about something besides what she thought of what was looking for vengeance on Jason. All in all, retribution was looked for by Medea. She went over the reality of showing Jason a thing or two; she even expressed she loathed Jason more than she cherished her youngsters. Answer this inquiry is what Medea has done engaging or ethically informative?

Discussion 1-2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Conversation 1-2 - Essay Example Other ordinarily utilized MS Office applications incorporate the Power Point for introductions, Access for overseeing database, and Publisher for distributing different archives or structures. There are numerous favorable circumstances of MS Office Applications. One of the upsides of MS Office is that it has all the segments that might be required for use inside a traditional office. Other than having immense number of highlights, MS Office has no degenerate records notwithstanding the way that the auto recuperation capacity can be utilized in ensuring that any report isn't lost to its whole (Habraken 10). Despite the fact that MS Office has different preferences, there are a few faults or downsides related with the equivalent. For example, MS Office has similarity issues. There are adaptations that are not good with some working frameworks. The above table was gotten from exceed expectations. The Excel was utilized to discover the all out number of eggs for breakfast contingent upon the quantity of individuals from the family present in a given day. Every relative needs to expend 2 eggs for breakfast. Subsequently, a capacity was created to discover the absolute number of eggs that would be required as the number relatives change. The recipe was to duplicate the quantity of relatives and the eggs per part.

How To Save Money on Back to School Supplies

How To Save Money on Back to School Supplies How To Save Money on Back to School Supplies How To Save Money on Back to School SuppliesTake stock, wait till youve got your shopping list, and become a master deal seeker to stretch your school supplies budget as far as it can go!It’s that time of year that so many kids dread: back to school! And while it can be nice to get your kids out of the house and back to the classroom, your wallet might be feeling a similar sense of dread. There are so many school supplies you’ll need to buy!Depending on your budget, you might even have to take out a personal loan to afford everything. Or worse: You might have to take out a series of high-interest no credit check loans like payday loans or cash advances. Youll do anything for your kids after all, and you don’t want them your kids falling behind just because they don’t have the right kinds of pencils.Waitâ€"do they still need a certain kind of pencil? Do they even need pencils at all anymore? Can you just get all of your back to school shopping done on the app store?No, you can not. But fear not! For we spoke to the experts to find out how you can stock up on school supplies without depleting your bank account. Look at what you’ve already got.Slow down! Don’t hit the store just yet. First, you should take stock of what you already have.“See what you can reuse,” advised Robyn, creator of the personal finance blog  A Dime Saved. “Not everything needs to be new every year. Go through last years supplies and see what can be used, passed down, and what needs to be replaced.”Katie Ross, Education and Development Manager at American Consumer Credit Counseling  offered similar advice: “Shop your closet. Before you start your back-to-school shopping, make a list of inventory and supplies you already own and might be able to reuse for the new school year.Although your childs school may issue a shopping list, you dont need to buy every single item on it. In fact, you can even contact your school or homeroom teacher to ask what items are critical in the first month so you have a financial cushion.”And speaking of that shopping list…Wait for the list, then plan.Although it might be tempting to get your back to school shopping out of the way as early as possible, you don’t want to accidentally buy something your children don’t actually need.“Plan before you shop,” advised Robyn. “Make sure you have your school supply lists along with an idea of what items you already have so you dont end up overbuying. If you have multiple kids that need the same items, you may be able to split value packs as well, so make sure to have an idea of what each child needs BEFORE you shop.”But you should also remember that list isn’t written in stone. Unless it is written in stone, in which case you should probably follow it precisely since that must have taken a lot of effort to carve. But more than likely, you’ll be able to take some of Associate Director of Relationship Development at Centerpoint Advisors  Ashley Agnew’s advice t o heart:“Ok, teachers might not like this one, but only buy the absolute necessities to get through the first two weeks. Your student should have an idea of what they will really need after a couple of weeks with their new teachers, and will most likely be given a few more items to shop for once they receive the overview of their curriculum causing another trip to the store anyhow.”Become a master deal seeker.Once you know exactly what you’ll have to buy, it’s time to become a student yourself A student of deals, that is!“First and foremost, do not underestimate your local dollar discount store,” Agnew told us. “Especially for younger children who tend to lose, break, and ‘share’ their supplies, big bucks can be saved by purchasing generic brand markers, pencils, pens, crayons, etc. The dollar store can also be a good resource if your classroom is requesting items such as cleaning supplies and hand sanitizers which can be pricey elsewhere.”She also suggested you get to know your credit cards and state tax system well: “Check your cash back deals on debit and credit cards. Many offer discounts of up to 10 percent at common superstores. Also waiting for your state’s tax-free weekend (if available) may be hectic but worth the savings.”And you can do some of the shopping without ever leaving your house!“Shop online and shop early,” recommended Robyn. “Many stores have back-to-school deals on certain items already. Quickly glance through some deal sites and store ads to see which items are on sale and stock up on the basics- pens, notebooks etc. Look online for coupons and take advantage of cashback apps. These little savings can add up in a big way!”Be discerning about where you spend a little more money.Kids don’t always understand how money works, so you may need to explain to them that they can’t always get that when it comes to back to school shopping.“Your kids may want to impress their classmates with the latest gear, but that doesnt mean you should get into consumer debt as a result,” advised Ross. “One thing here or there may be okay, but being practical is key. Avoid fancy supplies that you dont need and buy store brand if possible.”But there is one item you may want to consider putting a little more money into.“Buy a great backpack,” suggested Agnew. “Buying a good backpack that will last a few years will save you some bucks in the long run, especially if it comes with a warranty like L.L.Bean. Better backpacks tend to have more support, stronger straps and zippers and can double for sports and travel. Instead, let your littles choose a new lunch box every year. These are more than half the price, and after months of spilled juice, forgotten fruits, and molten fruit snacks, you might be happy to retire last year’s version.”Do you hear that? It’s the sound of the school bus pulling up! Thankfully the kids have everything they need, and your wallet wasn’t hit too hard!If yo u do find yourself needing to take out a bad credit loan to pay for school costs, skip the short-term payday and title loans in favor of a long-term installment loan with lower rates and more affordable payments. And to make sure you wont need any  loans next year, you can  learn more about saving money with these related posts from OppLoans:4 Simple Ways to Save Money on Your Grocery Billâ€"While Still Eating Healthy!The DO’s and DO NOT’s of Saving For College8 Ways To Save Money Today, Tomorrow and Every Day AfterWhat are your best tips for saving money on school supplies? We want to hear from you! You can find us  on  Facebook  and  Twitter.Visit OppLoans on  YouTube  |  Facebook  |  Twitter  |  LinkedINContributorsAshley Agnew creates value in investment management by helping clients have a better relationship with their wealth. At  Centerpoint Advisors, she facilitates financial coaching programs providing emotional and educational preparation for the next generations. Thes e include financial coaching and literacy seminars, college savings and retirement product research, and family round-table facilitation and moderation. She holds her B.S. in Marketing with a minor in communications writing from the University of Massachusetts as well as an MBA in global finance from Bryant University. In addition to her work at Centerpoint, she is also the Marketing Chair on the Board of Directors for XPX New England, an organization focused on business growth and transfer.Robyn is a mother and someone who feels passionately about helping people with their finances. She has taken her personal experience, advice she was given, things she has learned on her own and in her MBA studies and tries to share what she feels is important financially on her blog,  A Dime Saved  (@adimesaved).Katie Ross, joined the  American Consumer Credit Counseling, or ACCC, management team in 2002 and is currently responsible for organizing and implementing high-performance development ini tiatives designed to increase consumer financial awareness. Ms. Ross’s main focus is to conceptualize the creative strategic programming for ACCC’s client base and national base to ensure a maximum level of educational programs that support and cultivate ACCC’s organization.

The Effects Of Extreme Stress On Billy Pilgrim s...

How would one feel if he woke up one morning and couldn’t decipher what was real and what was his imagination? He would feel confused. But how would people react if he confused his imagination with reality? They would suspect that he is going crazy. This is actually quite similar to the character Billy Pilgrim in Slaughterhouse- Five by Kurt Vonnegut. Billy was a prisoner of war and witnessed the bombing of Dresden. After what he had witnessed, Billy shows signs of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder throughout the novel. He had trouble sleeping, he had nightmares, and he was constantly looking back at time and reliving the trauma he faced. According to the article Who Develops Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, â€Å"the effects of extreme stress has a long history, primarily focused on the effects of war† (Ozer and Weiss 1). One can assume that Billy developed PTSD after the war because of the way he acted. After seeing so many deaths from the war, Billy no longer has emotions towards death and sadness. By witnessing these horrible deaths and the bombing of Dresden, nothing seems horrific to Billy anymore. He shows no emotion when someone dies. He then confuses his life with science fiction novels and people begin to think he’s going crazy. After the war, his life was never the same. Ultimately, Billy Pilgrim is unable to live a normal life due to his traumatic memories from the war. Through several examples within the novel, Billy Pilgrim constantly relives his war memories. While heShow MoreRelatedSlaughterhouse Five Are Obvious And Piercing As One1139 Words   |  5 PagesSo It Goes Kurt Vonnegut’s anti-war novel, Slaughterhouse Five, illustrates the ghastly experiences within World War II and the journey through the universe and time of the main character, Billy Pilgrim. Although war is a sensitive subject in most cases, Vonnegut’s sarcastic, dark humor on the matter helps bring light to the fact that war is horrendous. Slaughterhouse Five demonstrates the reality of war throughout its major themes, historical accuracy, and Kurt Vonnegut’s personal experiences withinRead MoreThe Yellow Wallpaper, By Charlotte Perkins Gilman2534 Words   |  11 Pagescertain that Gilman’s own experiences of mental health problems and subsequent inadequate attempts at treatment provided the mainstay of her inspiration for the novel. In her autobiography Gilman stated that the real purpose of the story was to reach Dr. S. Weir Mitchell [her doctor], and convince him of the error of his ways’. Gilman’s use of such a forwardly unreliable n arrator was not ground-breaking, the technique has been utilised by authors from Chaucer to Sterne. Yet Gilman’s choice utilisation

History of the North American Free Trade Agreements

A free trade agreement is a pact between two countries or areas in which they both agree to lift most or all tariffs, quotas, special fees and taxes, and other barriers to trade between the entities. The purpose of free trade agreements is to allow faster and more business between the two countries/areas, which should benefit both. Why All Should Benefit from Free Trade The underlying economic theory of free trade agreements is that of comparative advantage, which originated in an 1817 book entitled On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation by British political economist David Ricardo. Put simply, the theory of comparative advantage postulates that that in a free marketplace, each country/area will ultimately specialize in that activity where it has comparative advantage (i.e. natural resources, skilled workers, agriculture-friendly weather, etc.) The result should be that all parties to the pact will increase their income. However, as Wikipedia points out: ... the theory refers only to aggregate wealth and says nothing about the distribution of wealth. In fact there may be significant losers... The proponent of free trade can, however, retort that the gains of the gainers exceed the losses of the losers. Claims that 21st Century Free Trade Doesnt Benefit All Critics from both sides of the political aisle contend that free trade agreements often dont work effectively to benefit either the U.S. or its free trade partners. One angry complaint is that more than three million U.S. jobs with middle-class wages have been outsourced to foreign countries since 1994. The New York Times observed in 2006: Globalization is tough to sell to average people. Economists can promote the very real benefits of a robustly growing world: when they sell more overseas, American businesses can employ more people. But what sticks in our minds is the television image of the father of three laid off when his factory moves offshore. Latest News In late June 2011, the Obama administration announced that three free trade agreements,.. with south Korea, Colombia and Panama... are fully negotiated, and ready to send to Congress for review and passage. These three pacts are expected to generate $12 billion in new, annual U.S. sales. Republicans stalled approval of the agreements, though, because they want to strip a small, 50-year-old worker retraining/support program from the bills. On December 4, 2010, President Obama announced completion of renegotiations of the Bush-era U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. See Korea-U.S. Trade Agreement Addresses Liberal Concerns. The deal that weve struck includes strong protections for workers rights and environmental standards--and as a consequence, I believe its a model for future trade agreements that I will pursue, commented President Obama about the U.S.-South Korea agreement. (see Profile of U.S.-South Korea Trade Agreement.) The Obama administration is also negotiating an entirely new free trade pact, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which includes eight nations: U.S., Australia, New Zealand, Chile, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam and Brunei. Per AFP, Nearly 100 US companies and business groups have urged Obama to conclude TPP negotiations by November 2011. WalMart and 25 other U.S. corporations have reportedly signed onto the TPP pact. Presidential Fast-Track Trade Authority In 1994, Congress let fast-track track authority to expire, to give Congress more control as President Clinton pushed the North American Free Trade Agreement. After his 2000 election, President Bush made free trade the center of his economic agenda, and sought to regain fast-track powers. The Trade Act of 2002 restored fast-track rules for five years. Using this authority, Bush sealed new free trade deals with Singapore, Australia, Chile and seven smaller countries. Congress Unhappy with Bush Trade Pacts Despite pressure from Mr. Bush, Congress refused to extend fast-track authority after it expired on July 1, 2007. Congress was unhappy with Bush trade deals for many reasons, including: Losses of millions of U.S. jobs and companies to foreign countriesExploitation of labor forces and resources and defilement of the environment in foreign countriesThe enormous trade deficit generated under President Bush International charity organization Oxfam vows to campaign to defeat trade agreements that threaten peoples rights to: livelihoods, local development, and access to medicines. History The first U.S. free trade agreement was with Israel, and took effect on September 1, 1985. The agreement, which has no expiration date, provided for the elimination of duties for goods, except for certain agricultural products, from Israel entering the U.S. The U.S.-Israeli agreement also allows American products to compete on an equal basis with European goods, which have free access to Israeli markets. The second U.S. free trade agreement, signed in January 1988 with Canada, was superceded in 1994 by the complex and controversial North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Canada and Mexico, signed with much fanfare by President Bill Clinton on September 14, 1993. Active Free Trade Agreements For a complete listing of all international trade pacts to which the U.S. is a party, see the United States Trade Representives listing of global, regional and bilateral trade agreements. For a listing of all worldwide free trade pacts, see Wikipedias List of Free Trade Agreements. Pros Proponents support U.S. free trade agreements because they believe that: Free trade increases sales and profits for U.S. businesses, thus strenghtening the economyFree trade creates U.S. middle-class jobs over the longtermFree trade is an opportunity for the U.S. to provide financial help to some of the worlds poorest countries Free Trade Increases U.S. Sales and Profits Removal of costly and delaying trade barriers, such as tariffs, quotas and conditions, inherently leads to easier and swifter trade of consumer goods. The result is an increased volume of U.S. sales. Also, use of less expensive materials and labor acquired through free trade leads to a lower cost to manufacture goods. The result is either increased profit margins (when sales prices are not lowered), or increased sales caused by lower selling prices. The  Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates  that ending all trade barriers would increase U.S. income by a whopping $500 billion annually. Free Trade Creates U.S. Middle-Class Jobs The theory is that as U.S. businesses grow from greatly increased sales and profits, demand will grow for middle-class higher-wage jobs to facilitate the sales increases. In February, the  Democratic Leadership Council, a centrist, pro-business think-tank headed by Clinton ally former Rep. Harold Ford, Jr., wrote: Expanded trade was undeniably a key part of the high-growth, low-inflation, high-wage economic expansion of the 1990s; even now it plays a key role in keeping inflation and unemployment at historically impressive levels. The  New York Times wrote  in 2006: Economists can promote the very real benefits of a robustly growing world: when they sell more overseas, American businesses can employ more people. U.S. Free Trade Helps Poorer Countries U.S. free trade benefits poorer, non-industrialized nations through increased purchases of their materials and labor services by the U.S. The  Congressional Budget Office explained: ... economic benefits from international trade arise from the fact that countries are not all the same in their production capabilities. They vary from one another because of differences in natural resources, levels of education of their workforces, technical knowledge, and so on. Without trade, each country must make everything it needs, including things it is not very efficient at producing. When trade is allowed, by contrast, each country can concentrate its efforts on what it does best... Cons Opponents of U.S. free trade agreements believe that: Free trade has caused more U.S. jobs losses than gains, especially for higher-wage jobs.Many free trade agreements are bad deals for the U.S. Free Trade Has Caused U.S. Jobs Losses A  Washington Post columnist wrote: While corporate profits soar, individual wages stagnate, held at least partly in check by the brave new fact of offshoring -- that millions of Americans jobs can be performed at a fraction of the cost in developing nations near and far. In his 2006 book Take This Job and Ship It, Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) decries, ... in this new global economy, no one is more profoundly affected than American workers... in the last five years, weve lost over 3 million U.S. jobs that have been oursourced to other countries, and millions more are poised to leave. NAFTA: Unfilled Promises and a Giant Sucking Sound When he signed NAFTA on September 14, 1993,  President Bill Clinton exulted, I believe that NAFTA will create a million jobs in the first five years of its impact. And I believe that that is many more than will be lost... But industrialist H. Ross Perot famously predicted a giant sucking sound of U.S. jobs heading to Mexico if NAFTA was approved. Mr. Perot was correct.  Reports the Economic Policy Institute: Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed in 1993, the rise in the U.S. trade deficit with Canada and Mexico through 2002 has caused the displacement of production that supported 879,280 U.S. jobs. Most of those lost jobs were high-wage positions in manufacturing industries. The loss of these jobs is just the most visible tip of NAFTAs impact on the U.S. economy. In fact, NAFTA has also contributed to rising income inequality, suppressed real wages for production workers, weakened workers  collective bargaining  powers and ability to organize unions, and reduced fringe benefits. Many Free Trade Agreements Are Bad Deals In June 2007, the Boston Globe reported about a pending new agreement, Last year, South Korea exported 700,000 cars to the United States while U.S. carmakers sold 6,000 in South Korea, Clinton said, attributing more than 80 percent of a $13 billion U.S. trade deficit with South Korea... And yet, the proposed new 2007 agreement with South Korea would not eliminate the barriers that severely restrict the sale of American vehicles per Sen. Hillary Clinton. Such lopsided dealings are common in  U.S. free trade agreements. Where It Stands U.S. free trade agreements have also harmed other countries, including: Workers in other countries are being exploited and harmed.The environment in other countries is being defiled. For example, the  Economic Policy Institute explains  about post-NAFTA Mexico: In Mexico, real wages have fallen sharply and there has been a steep decline in the number of people holding regular jobs in paid positions. Many workers have been shifted into subsistence-level work in the informal sector... Additionally, a flood of subsidized, low-priced corn from the U.S. has decimated farmers and rural economics. The impact on workers in countries as India, Indonesia, and China has been even more severe, with innumerable instances of starvation wages, child workers, slave-labor hours and perilous work conditions. And  Sen. Sherrod Brown  (D-OH) observes in his book Myths of Free Trade: As the Bush administration has worked overtime to weaken environmental and food safety rules in the U.S., Bush trade negotiators are trying to do the same in the global economy... The lack of international laws for environmental protection, for example, encourages firms to go to the nation with the weakest standards. As a result, some nations are conflicted in 2007 over U.S. trade deals. In late 2007, the  Los Angeles Times reported  about the pending CAFTA pact: About 100,000 Costa Ricans, some dressed as skeletons and holding banners, protested Sunday against a U.S. trade pact they said would flood the country with cheap farm goods and cause big job losses. Chanting No to the free-trade pact! and Costa Rica is not for sale! protesters including farmers and housewives filled one of San Joses main boulevards to demonstrate against the Central American Free Trade Agreement with the United States. Democrats Divided on Free Trade Agreements Democrats have coalesced in favor of trade policy reform over the past decade as President Bill Clintons NAFTA, WTO and China trade deals not only failed to deliver the promised benefits but caused real damage, said Lori Wallach of Global Trade Watch to  Nation contributing editor Christopher Hayes. But the centrist  Democratic Leadershp Council insists, While many Democrats find it tempting to Just Say No to Bush trade policies... , this would squander real opportunities to boost U.S. exports... and keep this country competitive in a global marketplace from which we cannot possibly isolate ourselves.

Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima, Japan, And The United States

August 6th 1945, the United States dropped the first of two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, Japan. World War Two was practically over, but Japan and the United States weren’t getting along due to Japan bombing Pearl Harbor. The President of the United States (Truman) and U.K. Prime Minister Winston Churchill Issued the Potsdam Declaration which was the declaration that was put on the table for Japan after Germany had surrendered. Earlier in the war we had been putting together atomic weapons in case the war was getting out of hand. Since Japan wouldn’t surrender after the Potsdam we dropped the 1st bomb. Japan had still not surrendered so we dropped a second bomb on Nagasaki, Japan. There was a combined total of casualties after the 1st bomb of 140,000. The second bomb totaled out to 120,000 casualties. Dropping these bombs helped the United States win the war. In my Opinion, the decision to drop both bombs on Japan was the best alternative the United States had to remain st able and to hold military lives. There are many reasons the United States choose to drop the Atomic bomb. According to the White House press release the decision was pretty much made up after the Potsdam declaration, which gave Japan the opportunity to surrender, was refused by Japan so the United States was then in full force. â€Å"Their leaders promptly rejected that ultimatum. If they do not now accept our terms they may expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on thisShow MoreRelatedIn August 1945, a uranium-type atomic bomb was dropped by the United States on Hiroshima, Japan,900 Words   |  4 Pagesuranium-type atomic bomb was dropped by the United States on Hiroshima, Japan, during the final stages of World War II. The following months after the bomb was dropped, many people were killed by burns, radiation sickness, and other injuries. These effects lasted about 4-6 months. Around 90,000 to 166,000 people died either instantaneous or the lasting effects. On August 15th , just days after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan announced their surrender to the Allies. Hiroshima and NagasakiRead MoreEssay on Atomic Bombing on Japan937 Words   |  4 PagesHiroshima: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb a Military Necessity? On the morning of August 6th, 1945 at around 8:16 a.m., the United States dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Little Boy.† Three days after the first atomic bomb was dropped, on August 9th, 1945 at around 11:02 a.m., the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Fat Man.† These two bombs immensely destroyed these cities and took the lives of many peopleRead MoreThe Atomic Bombs in Japan1373 Words   |  6 Pages1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima without any precedent. The explosion viciously destroyed four square miles of the city and killed 90,000 and injured 40,000. (Weber, â€Å"Was Hiroshima Necessary?†) Three days later, a second atomic bomb stroked the city of Nagasaki which killed approximately 37,000 people and injured 43,000 (Weber, â€Å"Was Hiroshima Necessary?†). These actions of the United States still re main controversial today and the United States’ abuseRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Is It Really Justified?1627 Words   |  7 PagesThe Atomic Bomb, was it really justified? On August 6, 1945, after forty-four months of increasingly brutal fighting in the Pacific, an American B-29 bomber loaded with a devastating new weapon flew in the sky over Hiroshima, Japan waiting for a signal. Minutes later the signal was given, that new weapon, the atomic bomb, was released. Its enormous destructive energy detonated in the sky, killing one hundred thousand Japanese civilians instantly. Three days later, on August 9, 1945, the UnitedRead MoreAmerica Chose To Drop Atomic Bombs On Japan, And This Affected1314 Words   |  6 PagesAmerica chose to drop atomic bombs on Japan, and this affected the war and the country in many ways. America was trying to stop the war and make Japan surrender. Atomic bombs, which are nuclear weapons, were dropped by the United States on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Atomic bombs terrify everyone today, but at that time, they were considered an indispensable step for an early end to the war with minimal human losses. So me people believed the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessaryRead MoreTruman s Decision For The Atomic Bomb980 Words   |  4 Pagesforever. Are other countries making the same bomb? What if it falls into the wrong hands? They would have the power to eliminate whatever they wanted.† Harry S. Truman had the tremendous decision that could and would change life forever. The atomic bomb was not like any other bomb. The atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, also known as Little boy was the biggest atomic bomb the world has ever seen. Truman made the right choice of choosing to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because it saved lives, causedRead MoreAtomic Bombs And Its Effects On Japan1369 Words   |  6 PagesCan you imagine how many atomic bombs that have killed many Japanese during, World War II in Japan? On August 6, 1945, a new weapon with a significant explosive power known as the atomic bombs just has been dropped on Japan. The dropping of this weapon on Hiros hima and Nagasaki there were 262,020 civilians were killed. The United States to chose the atomic bomb in order for Japan to surrender and end the war quickly. Likewise, President Truman as the duty as president and Commander in Chief to protectRead MoreWas The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Morally Justified?1736 Words   |  7 PagesWas the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ethically justified? – Why Truman decided to drop the atomic bombs on Japan – By Grace Kelsall World War 2 saw the emergence of America as a new world power on August 6th 1945, also internationally known as the traumatizing day for Hiroshima; after an American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb. World War Two is considered a great turning point in modern history, it being one of the bloodiest and horrific wars; exposing all countries aroundRead MoreThe Worldly Struggles Of The Sun Shines Essay1479 Words   |  6 Pagessituation, were quite common in Japan. Since the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Korean and Japanese people have been struggling to recover, both mentally and physically. In this paper, I will discuss the issue with nuclear weapons by explaining the events in history leading to the Atomic bombings, the victims’ struggle to recover from the bombings, and the action people are taking from the bombings in today’s society. The tension between the United State and Japan have? been around sinceRead MoreHiroshima, Japan, And Japan1352 Words   |  6 PagesAnswers Who: Hiroshima, Japan and Nagasaki, Japan Leader of Japan: Hideki Tojo, Minister of war Leader of United States: General Douglas MacArthur Hiroshima Hiroshima is a city located in Honshu, Japan. On August 6, 1945, Hiroshima became the first city in the world to be struck by an atomic bomb. (Hiroshima, britannica.com) From 1868 it was a military center, and was a target for the atomic bombing by U.S. during World War II. Nagasaki Nagasaki is a city located in Kyushu

Circular Economy Globalization

Question: Discuss about theCircular Economyfor Globalization. Answer: Introduction In this era if globalization, organizations have expanded in different parts of the world. The economies of various countries have expanded and the demand has increased exponentially. It is practically not possible to keep serving the demands of global population without sustainable development and recycling and these two concepts are the basis of circular economy. A circular economy seeks to rebuild capital, whether this is financial, manufactured, human, social or natural (Tukker, 2015). This ensures enhanced flows of goods and services. The objective of this report is to discuss the key benefits of circular economy. This report would discuss the key potential of the circular economy and the benefit that this system can bring for Australian companies. The report is based on the retail industry and it would focus on the ways that can enable the firms in the retail industry to gain competitive advantage through circular economy. Analysis The circular economy is a relatively new concept. The companies in the retail industry in Australia may not be using this concept much. However, the companies in retail industry in America and Europe have already started to focus on circular economy. It is expected that the trend of circular economy would pickup in Australia and there would be more and more firms in Australia that would start focusing on circular economy (Geng, 2016). The companies in the Australian retail segment may be particularly interested in the circular economy as there are various benefits like optimization, cost reduction, etc. The benefits of circular industry for the organizations in retail industry in Australia can be discussed as: Benefits of Circular Economy It is important to mention that circular economy is much more than recycling of goods. It is correct that the environmental impacts are definitely a major benefit of circular economy. However, there also exist various other benefits of circular economy that organizations in retail industry in Australia can not ignore (Golev Corder, 2016). The key benefits of circular economy for the organizations in retail industry can be discussed as: Optimization of Resources With the basic philosophy of circular economy, the organizations can optimize the use of resources. It means that the organizations in retail industry can actually produce more with the same set of resources and it would eventually improve the overall productivity of the organization. Cost Benefits With the focus on circular economy, organizations can actual save certain costs. Usually, organizations would have two types of costs (Halog, 2015). These would be capital expenditure and operation expenditure. The organizations may not be able to optimize the capital expenses. However, the circular economy would definitely provide a platform where the organizations can reduce its operational expenses. This is done through various optimization techniques such as waste management, recycling, multiple use of resources, etc. Sustainable development It is believed that the path of sustainable development could be achieved with the basic philosophy of circular economy. Therefore, it would be correct to say that sustainable development and circular economy goes hand in hand and in fact, circular economy could just be a way to practice sustainable development in the organization. Circular Economy and Competitive Advantage The companies would be able to practice and implement the principles of circular economy only when they realize the value that could be derived from circular economy. It can be said that the organizational design is the key for circular economy. Before focusing on competitive advantage through circular economy, the organizations should have an effective and flexible organizational design. While Winslow Taylor and Henri Fayol significantly impacted how organizations function with the ultimate objective of sustainable development, Elton Mayo impacted contemporary organizational design the most. Fayol took Taylors work and expanded it to eventually create what is the foundation for modern organizational management. There was not a lot of focus on worker satisfaction, but more on structure and management. Although hierarchal structures suggested by Fayol still work in many organizations, such as the military, organizations needed to change when the environment changed. Mayo focused on ho w worker satisfaction affected productivity. He believed that workers, and society in general, were happiest and most productive when conflict was minimal and people had a sense of security, both mentally and economically (Ionescu Negrusa, 2013). Mayo realized that people needed to know they had a place and were important, and that security and general satisfaction in their workplace made them more productive. More secure, happy people equal a more industrious environment. The strategic management theories around competitive advantage suggests that organizations would usually have competitive advantage through one of the two ways of product or service differentiation and cost leadership. With the circular economy, organizations may be able to use cost leadership as competitive advantage (Golev Corder, 2016). With the focus on circular economy, the organizations in retail industry can actually reduce the cost of operations and this could result in competitive advantage through cost leadership. Challenges of Circular Economy It is correct that circular economy has various benefits for multiple stakeholders like organizations, governments and society at large. However, there also exist several challenges of circular economy. One of the biggest challenge is that it may not be easy to change the organizational design or to align the organisational design with the basic theme or philosophy of circular economy (Halog, 2015). Organizational design and development centres around the idea of planned change interventions which should improve the long-term health and performance of any organization. One key factor is that top management must actually buy into the long-range approach to change. Organizational design in todays society has grown to take many factors into consideration when assessing the way organizations should be structured to meet the demands of change. The other key challenge could be the change management challenge. There are several significant elements that ensure successful change in an organization. However, management has to understand that in order for significant change to take place the organization must do an overall assessment of where the organization needs to improvement. With the many dynamics in business today organizations are seeking innovated ways to remain on the cutting edge; out front of the customers. Hass Krausmann (2016) argued that conducting an organizational assessment to determine if and where change is necessary is very important. Organizations should conduct such assessments periodically, perhaps as part of their annual strategic planning activities. According to Kraatz and Zajac (2001), Strategic change has been recognized as an important phenomenon because it represents the means through which organizations maintain coalignment with shifting competitive, technological, and social environments which occasionally pose threats to their continued survival and effectiveness (p. 632). Conclusion and Recommendations The above report discusses the various aspects of circular economy. With the above discussion it can be said that there are various benefits of circular economy; however it is not easy to implement the practices or philosophies of circular economy. Therefore, it is important that the organizations in retail industry and other industries should identify the way to overcome the challenges before taking the steps to implement the basic principles of circular economy. Some of the recommendations for the organizations in the retail industry can be discussed as: It is recommended that the organizations must take the inputs from various stakeholders of the organization. The internal stakeholders like employees are the key (Haas Krausmann, 2016). The organizations in retail industry, the big or the small retail stores should not avoid the discussion with any of the stakeholders before following the principles of circular economy. It is recommended that the organizations should have a structured approach to change management that occurs with the implementation of circular economy. observed that organizations seeking change gothrough a series of steps: idea generation, determination of need, buildingsupport, implementation, and obtaining resources. Idea generation anddetermining need are obviously important, as without good ideas that advance anorganizations goals, nothing will change (Golev Corder, 2016).Implementation and obtaining resources are also obviouslyimportant. After all, without the properfinancial resources, material and equipment, and staff development, even thebest of ideas is doomed to failure. It is recommended that the organizations in retail industry should take a small and gradual steps with circular economy (Figueroa, 2015). The big bang approach may not be the recommended approach. It is important that the organizations should define the small targets and then the progress of the company should be measured against the defined targeted state. The small organizations in the retail industry can also use benchmarking to benchmark their operations and practices against the practices of large organizations in the global retail industry. References Geng, Y., Sarkis, J. and Ulgiati, S., 2016. Sustainability, well-being, and the circular economy in China and worldwide.Science, (6278 (Suppl.)), pp.73-76. Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Figueroa, A. and Koh, S.L., 2015. Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications.Omega. Golev, A. and Corder, G., 2016. Modelling metal flows in the Australian economy.Journal of Cleaner Production,112, pp.4296-4303. Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D. and Heinz, M., 2016. How Circular Is the Global Economy? A Sociometabolic Analysis. InSocial Ecology(pp. 259-275). Springer International Publishing. Ionescu, G. G., Negrusa, A. L. (2013). Elton Mayo, an enthusiastical managerial philosopher. Review of International Comparative Management / Revista De Management Comparat International, 14(5), 671-688. Kraatz, M. S., Zajac, E. J. (2001).How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence.Organization Science, 12(5), 632-657. Pagotto, M. and Halog, A., 2015. Towards a Circular Economy in Australian Agrià ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ food Industry: An Application of Inputà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ Output Oriented Approaches for Analyzing Resource Efficiency and Competitiveness Potential.Journal of Industrial Ecology. Tukker, A., 2015. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economya review.Journal of cleaner production,97, pp.76-91.